necessity rule – MD Update

A Checkup on Medicaid and Behavioral Health Services

July 1, 2016 Christopher J. Shaughnessy acceptance, alternative benefit plan, behavioral health, behavioral health coverage, behavioral health provider, behavioral health service, behavioral health service organization, care organization, Chip, CMS, coverage, coverage of mental health, denial of payment, determination of medical necessity, disorder, effect of Medicaid coverage, epidemic substance use disorder, expanded behavioral health service, expansion of Medicaid, health parity, health provider, health provider type, health service, heroin, holdout state, human service, implication of the report, individual experience symptom, individual experience symptom of depression, Kentucky, level action, managed care organization, managed-care, Medicaid, Medicaid coverage, Medicaid expansion, Medicaid plan, Medicaid service, medical necessity rule, mental health, mental health parity, multitude of new behavioral health provider type, necessity rule, new behavioral health provider type, new rule, opioid addiction epidemic, parity, parity requirement, policymaker, proliferate problem confront behavioral health, provider, provision of the mental health parity, publication of the rule, regulatory burden, reimbursement, reimbursement rate, shortage, state 's Medicaid plan, state acceptance, state acceptance of the Medicaid expansion, state managed-care plan, state of behavioral health, stymied coverage, substance, substance use disorder, substance use disorder benefit, substance use disorder treatment, substance use service, traditional Medicaid program, treatment option, uninsured individual

It has been a long time coming, but on March 30, 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)

Read more